US man charged in New York City subway chokehold death | Courts News


A person who killed a homeless New York Metropolis subway passenger by inserting him in a chokehold has been charged with manslaughter, because the demise of Jordan Neely continues to attract condemnation and requires higher social companies in the USA.

Daniel Penny, a former US Marine, appeared in Manhattan Legal Court docket to be arraigned on one rely of second-degree manslaughter on Friday, simply hours after turning himself in at a police station.

Penny didn’t enter a plea, and a choose authorised his launch on bond however ordered him to give up his passport and never depart New York with out approval.

A day earlier, prosecutors said they intended to cost the 24-year-old with manslaughter within the killing of Neely, 30, in early Might.

A viral video confirmed Penny placing Neely in a chokehold on Might 1 whereas they rode on the F practice in Manhattan. Neely died from a compression of the neck, the medical expert later mentioned, however Penny’s attorneys mentioned he didn’t imply to kill him.

The case has prompted a nationwide debate about violence in opposition to folks experiencing homelessness and psychological well being points, in addition to the companies out there to them.

In accordance with witnesses, Neely, who was identified to impersonate Michael Jackson within the New York Metropolis subway system, was complaining loudly about being hungry and saying he was able to die when Penny got here up behind him and gripped him across the neck.

Subway riders look on as folks protest the demise of Jordan Neely, in New York Metropolis, Might 8 [Andrew Kelly/Reuters]

Penny restrained him on the ground of the subway automobile till he appeared to cease transferring. Neely was later declared useless.

The killing, and a delay by prosecutors in charging Penny, sparked protests, with some saying the incident amounted to a “lynching” and an instance of “white vigilantism” in opposition to folks of color. Neely was Black and Penny is white.

In an announcement from his authorized staff, Penny expressed “condolences to these near Mr. Neely”. The assertion alleged that Neely had aggressively threatened passengers using within the subway automobile.

“Daniel by no means meant to hurt Mr. Neely and couldn’t have foreseen his premature demise,” it mentioned.

Donte Mills, a lawyer for Neely’s household, mentioned the 30 12 months outdated wasn’t harming anybody. “There was no assault,” Mills mentioned throughout a information convention on Friday. “Mr Neely didn’t assault anybody. He didn’t contact anybody. He didn’t hit anybody. However he was choked to demise.”

Penny, he mentioned, “acted with indifference. He didn’t care about Jordan, he cared about himself. And we are able to’t let that stand.”

Neely’s father, Andre, wept as one other household lawyer, Lennon Edwards, recounted the final moments earlier than Penny tackled Neely to the bottom and put him in a chokehold. “What did he assume would occur?” Mills requested.

US Congressman Ritchie Torres, who represents a New York district, wrote on Twitter on Friday morning that Penny “must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the regulation”.

“Jordan Neely was not armed with any weapon. He didn’t assault any particular person. He didn’t manifest any bodily menace. There was no justification for choking him to demise,” Torres mentioned.

New York Metropolis Mayor Eric Adams has confronted criticism for his response to Neely’s killing, in addition to for a crackdown on homelessness launched by his administration.

Adams initially kept away from commenting in depth on Neely’s demise, however in an announcement on Wednesday, he mentioned, “Jordan Neely didn’t need to die.”

“Jordan Neely’s life mattered. He was affected by extreme psychological sickness, however that was not the reason for his demise. His demise is a tragedy that by no means ought to have occurred,” the mayor mentioned.

A second-degree manslaughter cost in New York would require the jury to seek out that an individual has engaged in reckless conduct that creates an unjustifiable danger of demise, after which consciously disregards that danger.

The regulation additionally requires that conduct to be a gross deviation from how an affordable particular person would act in an analogous scenario.

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here